Matthew 21:46 KJV

But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet.

Previous Verse
« Matthew 21:45
Next Verse
Matthew 22:1 »

Matthew 21:46 Bible Commentary

Commentary on Matthew 21:46

“But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitudes, because they took him for a prophet.”

Introduction

Matthew 21:46 marks a significant moment during Jesus' final days before His crucifixion. In this passage, we witness the growing tension between Jesus and the religious leaders. The verse elucidates not only the animosity of the leaders but also their fears regarding public perception.

Contextual Analysis

The culmination of events leading to this verse is crucial for understanding its implications. Jesus had just delivered the parable of the wicked husbandmen (Matthew 21:33-41), emphasizing the rejection of God's messengers and foreshadowing the rejection He Himself would face. The leaders understood that the parable was directed at them, intensifying their desire to arrest Him.

Insights from Public Domain Commentaries

Matthew Henry's Commentary

Matthew Henry highlights that the fear of the multitude prevented the chief priests and Pharisees from taking immediate action against Jesus. They recognized Him as a prophet, and the visible support He had from the people constrained them from overt hostility. Henry emphasizes the irony that the very people who should have recognized Jesus as the Messiah failed to do so due to their envy and pride.

Albert Barnes' Notes

Albert Barnes elaborates on the concept of Jesus being viewed as a prophet. He notes that the leaders were aware that any overt action against Jesus could lead to a public uproar, as the people were increasingly drawn to Him. Barnes points out the precarious position of the leaders—intellectually acknowledging Jesus' authority while practically denying Him. This highlights a recurring theme in the Gospels: the fear of man often hinders spiritual insight and obedience.

Adam Clarke's Commentary

Adam Clarke focuses on the prophetic role of Jesus, comparing Him to Old Testament prophets who faced similar opposition. He underscores the implications of the leaders’ fear, suggesting that their refusal to acknowledge Jesus’ divine identity resulted in spiritual blindness. Clarke asserts that recognizing Jesus as a prophet without accepting His messianic role represents a significant failure of faith, which can resonate deeply with contemporary audiences.

Theological Implications

This verse presents several theological implications:

  • Authority of Christ: The fear of the multitudes indicates the authority and impact Jesus had during His ministry. His words resonated deeply with the common people, who viewed Him as a messenger from God.
  • Spiritual Blindness: The leaders' refusal to act on their knowledge of Jesus' prophetic role reveals the danger of spiritual blindness. This serves as a cautionary tale for anyone who might recognize truth but choose to rebel against it.
  • Public Perception: The dynamics of popularity and authority are on display here. The fear of public opinion can often paralyze leaders from making righteous decisions. This is particularly relevant in modern ministry contexts where church leaders may shy away from truth to maintain favor.

Practical Application

For pastors and church leaders, this verse serves as a reminder of the need for courageous leadership in the face of public scrutiny. Acknowledgment of Jesus’ role as the Christ must come with the boldness to declare His truth, regardless of societal pressures.

For students and scholars, Matthew 21:46 encourages a deeper investigation into the nature of faith and recognition. It challenges the reader to confront areas of spiritual blindness in their own lives and to consider how often fear of human opinion can cloud one’s recognition of divine truth.

Conclusion

Matthew 21:46 encapsulates a pivotal moment in the Gospels, illustrating both the rejection of Jesus by the religious authorities and the complexities of public perception. By drawing upon historic commentaries, we gain a deeper understanding of the implications of this passage and its enduring relevance today.